Comments on: A just war

By: Quadri Zafruddin

Quadri Zafruddin — Sat, 03 Jul 2010 11:23:27 +0000

a war for justification

By: Mel

Mel — Sat, 19 Jun 2010 15:10:04 +0000

I would say stopping Hitler was a just war. No oxymoron.

By: Coyotes11

Coyotes11 — Mon, 14 Jun 2010 15:23:08 +0000

you got that right

By: Coyotes11

Coyotes11 — Mon, 14 Jun 2010 15:21:16 +0000

This is not an oxymoron (unless you are a moron!)

By: smowlboker

smowlboker — Thu, 29 Apr 2010 00:50:21 +0000

While this is definitely crap, I wouldn't necessarily say it's liberal. Anti-war sentiments don't really fit in to the ideals of either party, it just so happens that a lot of liberals are also douchebag peace activists. (Not that peace is bad, just that peace activists are generally douchers)

By: B.E.A.S.T.

B.E.A.S.T. — Mon, 19 Apr 2010 17:04:25 +0000

haha

By: spankymicgee

spankymicgee — Tue, 09 Mar 2010 10:43:21 +0000

wow,this makes sence=]

By: ern

ern — Mon, 01 Feb 2010 13:58:53 +0000

The problem is that they *aren't* philosophically mutually exclusive. “Bureaucratic efficiencies” isn't an oxymoron either. A “rhetorical” oxymoron is basically something that isn't an oxymoron, but that some people *wish* was an oxymoron. But that doesn't change the reality that it still isn't one.

By: Bob Peterson

Bob Peterson — Sun, 15 Nov 2009 15:31:37 +0000

Let me just say, this entire website is full of liberal crap.

By: spectator

spectator — Mon, 19 Oct 2009 07:34:55 +0000

Wow we have some guileful warmongers here. This is not a definitional oxymoron but a rhetorical oxymoron, meaning the terms “just[ice]” and “war” are philosophically mutually exclusive – something this site seems to have little problem with (”bureaucratic efficiencies” has been certified here).